All Things Grammar
  • Home
  • 100 Best Practices
  • Contact Me
  • Grammar City: FREE GRAMMAR BOARD GAME
  • Add '-s' or '-es' or 'ies'
  • Adjectives and Adverbs
  • Adverbs of Frequency
  • Although
  • And But So Because
  • Articles
  • As ... As Comparisons
  • Be Verb
  • Be Verb: Negative
  • Be Verb: Past
  • Can and Could
  • Capitalization
  • Collocations with 'Get'
  • Collocations with 'Have'
  • Collocations with 'Take'
  • Commonly Confused Words
  • Comparatives
  • Could You...? Requests
  • Count & Non-count Nouns
  • Do / Go / Play
  • Either...or / Neither...nor
  • First Conditional
  • Future Continuous
  • Future: Going To
  • Future: 'Going To' vs 'Will'
  • Future: Present Continuous
  • Future: Will
  • Gerunds and Infinitives
  • Have (Possession)
  • Have To
  • However
  • Indefinite Pronouns
  • Like / Hate & Like To / Hate to
  • Linkers: Time (Past) / first, then, after that, etc.
  • May and Might
  • Modals of Probability
  • Must (necessity)
  • Numbers: Cardinal
  • Ought To
  • Participle Adjectives: '-ed' vs '-ing'
  • Partitives
  • Parts of Speech
  • Passive
  • Past Continuous
  • Past Perfect
  • Past Simple
  • Past Simple: Negatives
  • Past Time Words
  • Phrasal Verbs with 'Get'
  • Phrasal Verbs with 'Take'
  • Phrasal Verbs with 'Up'
  • Place and Movement
  • Plural & Singular Nouns
  • Possessive Adjectives
  • Possessive Pronouns
  • Possessive: 's / s'
  • Prefix: Re-
  • Prefix: Un-
  • Prefixes: Im- / In-
  • Present Continuous
  • Present Perfect Continuous
  • Present Perfect Simple
  • Present Perfect: For and Since
  • Present Simple
  • Quantifiers: Some and Any
  • Quoted Speech
  • Reflexive Pronouns
  • Relative Clauses
  • Reported Speech
  • Second Conditional
  • Should
  • Should Have
  • Stative Verbs
  • Subject and Object Pronouns
  • Suffix: -able
  • Suffix: -er
  • Suffix: -ness
  • Superlatives
  • Tag Questions
  • Tenses: Review
  • Their / There / They're
  • There is / There are
  • Third Conditional
  • This / That / These / Those
  • Time: At / In / On
  • Too
  • Too and Enough
  • Used to
  • Whatever / Whenever Etc
  • W/H Questions (Past Simple)
  • W/H Questions (Present Simple)
  • Wish: Present
  • Word Order
  • Would Like / Would Like To
  • Yes / No Questions (Past)
  • Yes / No Questions (Present)
  • Yes / No Questions (Present Continuous)
  • Zero Conditional

The coming singularity and the end of elt

6/4/2016

2 Comments

 
Admittedly, it's strange for my first blog entry to begin with speculations on the end of English language teaching.  

And yet, whenever I read ELT conference titles like, "Trends in EFL" or "Using Technology in EFL", I can't help but think of other recent technological trends, especially those in computing power and artificial intelligence. 

TRENDS IN COMPUTATIONAL POWER

In 1965, Gordon E. Moore, the co-founder of Intel and Fairchild Semiconductor, published a paper in which he described a doubling every year in the number of components per integrated circuit.  He later revised his prediction in 1975 to a doubling once every two years.  This is known as Moore's law.

Despite some criticism (mainly that exponential growth cannot continue indefinitely), predictions of exponential growth in computing power have proven to be, so far, more or less accurate.
  • In 1951, the first commercial computer was produced in the United States (the UNIVAC I) and filled an entire large room and required several people to keep it operational.​  
  • By 1967, the computer had shrunk in size and increased in speed enough to guide Apollo 11 to the moon.
  • In 1997, an IBM super-computer known as Deep Blue emerged as the victor in a chess match with the reigning chess champion Garry Kasparov.  More recently, in 2011, an IBM computer named Watson challenged two expert human contestants on a television quiz show called Jeopardy - and won.  
  • Now, in 2016, the laptop in front of me is many, many times smaller and more powerful still than those used during the Apollo moon missions. 
​
Given this background, predictions that computer intelligence will exceed human intelligence sometime during the next fifteen to twenty years seem not at all far-fetched. The exact date that this happens has been referred to as the 'singularity'.

GOOGLE TRANSLATE

"And don't just write your paragraph in your own language and then use Google Translate", I regularly admonish the students in my writing class.  

​"Why not?" they sometimes ask.  "Because," I answer, "when you do that, anyone can tell that a computer has translated it!  It's okay with individual words and short phrases, but it's terrible with longer chunks of language."  I continue, "And if you do, I'll just make you write it over again."  Moans from my students.


And then I hesitate a moment before I add - somewhat uncomfortably - "When Google Translate gets better, you won't have to learn English."

​AUGMENTED REALITY EARBUDS
​ARE ... 'HERE'


In February of this year, livescience.com reported on the unveiling of a new product by 'Here Active Listening' - wireless earbuds (similar to the ones used with your cell phone, but without the connecting wires).

"New earbuds from Here Active Listening can now instantly transform sounds from your surroundings.  These wearable devices seek to 'augment reality' - in this case your soundscape.  In the future, these devices could enable translation of live speech, much like the 'universal translators' in 'Star Trek', said researchers at Doppler Labs, where the Here system was invented.  'We believe in a future where supercomputers can fit in the ears,' Noah Kraft, co-founder and CEO of Doppler Labs, told Live Science."

WHAT NEXT?

Well, yeah ....  That's a lot to wrap your head around, especially
​if you're an English teacher, a student of English, or anyone who has ever remembered to pack a phrase book before they set off on that exotic getaway.

Just imagine, in about twenty or thirty years, once computing power has doubled, and doubled, and doubled again - to a point where it far surpasses human intelligence - simply inserting two small devices in your ears.  The person standing before you says something in Spanish (or some other language) - and instantly you hear a perfect translation.  If you have ever read the 'Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy', the Babel Fish may come to mind.


All the implications are too many to discuss here (although the video below presents a few).  However, it seems that, if you are in the field of English language teaching, congratulations!  We may be counted among the last generation or two to earn our daily bread by teaching English.  

Our grandchildren will likely shake their heads in disbelief at the idea of having to spend years to learn (just one!) foreign language.  

Does this mean I should stay in bed tomorrow - and call my boss to tell him I'm not coming in to teach?  Does this mean my students should give up on English?  No, definitely not.  That would be a little like despairing the coming destruction of our Earth - billions of years in the future.  Universal translators probably won't be on the market for another decade or two.  

​In the meantime, Here Active Listening sounds like an interesting investment opportunity ...

8 June 2016 Update

It seems that I may be a little behind the times.  Watch the Youtube video introducing the instantaneous translation device from Waverly Labs below...

2 Comments
Ian
7/10/2016 06:32:32 pm

Artificial intelligence ...self explanatory ...fake, man-made ...too many of us romanticise about AI surpassing the human intelligence.

Reply
Robert Dobie
7/11/2016 04:18:40 pm

Hi Ian. Yes, I have reservations about the day when translation software becomes good enough to be 'human-like'. Studies show that knowing two or more languages is beneficial for intelligence and brain development. I wonder if technology is making us 'stupider'? Or, am I just clinging to the past?

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Robert has been an EFL / ESL teacher for nearly three decades and is currently living and teaching in Abu Dhabi.

    Archives

    June 2016

    Categories

    All

    Tweet
✕